What is Proof of Capacity (PoC)?

What is Proof of Capacity (Cryptocurrency) ?

Proof of capacity (PoC), also known as proof of space, is an energy efficient consensus mechanism algorithm used in blockchains that allows mining devices in the network to use their available hard drive space to decide mining rights and validate transactions.

Unlike energy-intensive consensus algorithms like proof of work, proof of capacity consensus aims to be an energy efficient way to secure cryptocurrency networks while still keeping them decentralized.

In this comprehensive guide, you’ll learn all about how proof of capacity works, its advantages and disadvantages, and some of the top PoC cryptocurrencies using this algorithm today.

How Exactly Does PoC Work?

At a high level, proof of capacity works by allowing miners to use empty space on their hard drives to decide mining rights and validate transactions on a blockchain network. It takes a different approach from proof of work, which relies on computational power.

Here’s a quick overview of how it works:

• Miners first store a “plot file” on their hard disk, which is generated based on the available drive space. This plot file contains billions of cryptographic hashes.
• These hashes are paired with possible nonce values for the next block. Miners can quickly look up a hash in their plot file to find a matching nonce value.
• When it’s time to validate a new block, the algorithm selects miners based on the amount of storage space they have committed in the network.
• Miners look up whether their plot file contains the hash required to validate the new block. The first one to find a match and validate can claim the block reward.
• This process repeats for each new block. The more capacity a miner commits, the higher their chances of winning the mining reward.

As you can see, rather than buying expensive specialized hardware, proof of capacity allows everyday computers to participate in mining by committing their spare hard drive space. The consensus algorithm combines mining with distributed storage.

Next, let’s look at some of the key benefits and drawbacks of proof of capacity compared to other consensus mechanisms like proof of work.

Advantages of Proof of Capacity (PoC)

Here are some of the major advantages and key benefits of using a proof of capacity consensus algorithm:

• Energy efficiency – Since mining doesn’t rely on computational power, PoC requires very little energy consumption compared to proof-of-work mining. This makes it much more sustainable.
• Lower barrier to entry -Regular computers with spare hard drive space can participate in PoC mining. No need for expensive, specialized ASIC miners. This helps decentralize the network.
• Use of spare resources – PoC puts idle hard drive space to productive use securing the blockchain network. There’s little incremental cost to miners.
• Less prone to mining centralization – Computational mining power tends to centralize among a few big players. But spare drive space is more evenly distributed, giving more users a chance to mine.
• ASIC resistant – ASIC miners offer no advantages in PoC because mining power comes from storage space, not computing power. This makes it resistant to ASIC mining domination.

For these reasons, proof of capacity presents an intriguing alternative consensus mechanism that offers distinct advantages over proof of work. Next, let’s look at some potential downsides.

Disadvantages and Challenges with Proof of Capacity

While it does solve some major issues with proof of work, proof of capacity also comes with its own unique disadvantages to consider:

• Requires large storage space – Miners need terabytes of spare drive space to be competitive. This may limit who can realistically mine.
• Less tested at scale – PoC is newer and less battle-tested than PoW. The long-term security implications are less understood.
• Plotting can be time consuming – While mining needs little power, plotting the initial file requires considerable time and storage.
• Security concerns with reuse – Storage space needs to be regularly rewritten to prevent reuse attacks. This takes effort and reduces storage utility.
• Centralization risks – Data centers and cloud storage providers could dominate PoC mining with their massive spare capacity.
• Rewards frequent replotting – The more often miners replot, the more rewards they can obtain, which may encourage unnecessary replotting.

While PoC offers intriguing benefits, it also needs to overcome these challenges around security, storage, and accessibility for mainstream adoption.

How Does Proof of Capacity Compare to Proof of Work and Proof of Stake?

PoW, PoS, and PoC are all viable consensus mechanisms for blockchains. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the best choice for a particular blockchain will depend on its specific needs. PoW is the oldest and safest consensus mechanism, but it is also the most energy-intensive. PoS is a more energy-efficient consensus mechanism, but it can be less decentralized. PoC is a new and promising consensus mechanism that offers several advantages over PoW and PoS, but it is still under development.

Detailed comparison

Feature	PoW	PoS	PoC
How it works	Nodes use computing power to solve complex mathematical puzzles. The first node to solve the puzzle is allowed to add the new block to the blockchain and receive a reward.	Nodes use their staked cryptocurrency to validate blocks. Nodes with more staked cryptocurrency have a higher chance of being selected.	Nodes use their hard drive space to validate blocks. When a new block needs to be validated, nodes compete to solve a mathematical problem using the data stored on their hard drives. The first node to solve the problem gets to add the block to the blockchain and receive a reward.
Resource requirements	Computing power	Staked cryptocurrency	Hard drive space
Advantages	Secure, safe	Energy efficient, does not require expensive hardware	Energy efficient, does not require expensive hardware
Disadvantages	Energy-intensive, expensive	Can centralize power	Can centralize power
Decentralization	High	High	Medium
Scalability	Medium	High	Medium
Transparency	High	High	High
Examples	Bitcoin, Ethereum (old)	Ethereum 2.0, Cardano, Solana	Chia, Signum, Burstcoin

Proof of capacity takes quite a different approach to consensus than the two most common algorithms, proof of work (used by Bitcoin) and proof of stake (used by Ethereum 2.0).

Here’s a quick overview of the key differences between the three:

• Proof of Work – Relies on computer processing power and electricity consumption. Very energy intensive but offers strong security. Tends to lead to mining centralization.
• Proof of Stake – Relies on users staking or locking up their coin holdings to validate blocks. Energy efficient and resists mining centralization but has some security tradeoffs.
• Proof of Capacity – Relies on spare hard drive space rather than computing power or staked coins. Energy efficient like PoS but offers different security model.

In a sense, you can view PoC as combining the energy efficiency of PoS with the open participation of PoW, although it comes with its own unique pros and cons rather than inheriting the best of both worlds.

The relative merits of each consensus mechanism are still being actively researched and debated in the crypto space. But PoC offers a compelling energy-efficient alternative to PoW for newer networks.

Factors to consider when choosing a consensus mechanism

When choosing a consensus mechanism for their blockchain, developers need to consider the following factors:

• Purpose of the blockchain: If the blockchain is used to store important financial transactions, then a secure and safe consensus mechanism like PoW or PoS is necessary. If the blockchain is used for less important applications, then a more efficient and decentralized consensus mechanism like PoS or PoC may be sufficient.
• Size and distribution of the network: Consensus mechanisms like PoW and PoS can be effective for large and distributed networks, but they may not be effective for smaller networks.
• Requirements for security and performance: Consensus mechanisms like PoW and PoS offer a high level of security, but they may not be as efficient as consensus mechanisms like PoS or PoC.

The best consensus mechanism for a particular blockchain will depend on the specific needs of the blockchain and the developers’ goals.

Top Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Using Proof of Capacity

While still much less common than PoW or PoS, proof of capacity is gaining attention in the crypto world. Here are some of the top cryptocurrencies using proof of capacity today:

Burstcoin

One of the earliest crypto projects to use proof of capacity for mining, having launched in 2014. Burstcoin uses PoC to conduct energy efficient mining of blocks while maintaining high levels of network security and decentralization.

Chia

A newer blockchain launched in 2021 that uses PoC for both consensus and as a foundation for decentralized applications like digital art registry and payment platforms. Chia has attracted attention for its energy efficiency.

SpaceMint

Another newer PoC crypto that emphasizes data storage and regular hard drive replotting. It aims to be ASIC resistant while offering a more egalitarian mining experience.

Signum

Originally launched as Burstcoin 2.0, Signum combines PoC with smart contract functionality. It was fully rebranded to Signum in 2021 and offers decentralized finance applications.

Oregano

A privacy-focused blockchain using PoC to record transactions shielded through zk-SNARK zero-knowledge proofs. It aims to provide anonymous payments and messaging.

While still a relatively small group, expect more experimentation with proof of capacity as blockchain projects aim for greater efficiency and accessibility.

Conclusion and Looking Ahead

Proof of capacity offers an energy efficient alternative to proof of work for securing blockchain consensus and minting new coins. By leveraging spare hard drive space, it allows more everyday users to participate in mining.

However, PoC comes with its own challenges around storage, security, and accessibility that still need addressing. It also remains less battle tested than PoW and PoS.

Projects like Chia and Signum will go a long way in demonstrating whether proof of capacity can scale effectively in production while resisting consolidation of mining power.

Looking ahead, we may see hybrid consensus models that blend proof of capacity with proof of stake or other mechanisms to maximize the benefits. The search continues for the optimal balance of security, efficiency, and decentralization.

While still an emerging concept, proof of capacity shows promising potential as a sustainable web3 infrastructure component if its unique challenges can be overcome through technical innovation and accountable governance.

Summary of Main Points:

• Proof of capacity allows miners to use spare hard drive space instead of computational power to validate blocks.
• Plot files stored on drives contain precomputed hashes miners can quickly match to solve mining puzzles.
• PoC is more energy efficient and ASIC resistant than proof of work mining.
• However, PoC comes with concerns around storage, security, and accessibility.
• Major PoC cryptocurrencies include Burstcoin, Chia, Signum and SpaceMint.
• PoC aims for sustainability but needs more testing and development to reach mainstream potential.

FAQs