Tornado Cash Ban Blows Winds of Both Division and Unity Through Crypto Community

Tornado Cash Ban Blows Winds of Both Division and Unity Through Crypto Community
Source: Adobe/Vladimir Kazakov

The transfer from the United States Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) to successfully ban the Ethereum (ETH)-powered crypto mixing service Tornado Cash has polarized the crypto neighborhood.

Some assume it’s a signal that extra sweeping regulatory measures may very well be on their means – whereas others have instructed that the OFAC’s resolution so as to add Tornado Cash to its Specially Designated Nationals record might transform a optimistic step.

Here are some of the arguments from either side.

United we stand…

Many crypto customers seem to have been spooked by the OFAC’s transfer and are fearful of the results. While the neighborhood seems to agree that unhealthy actors search to make use of providers like Tornado Cash to launder funds, some argue that privacy-providing apps are necessary.

Bitcoin (BTC) entrepreneur Ragnar Lifthrasir took to Twitter to write that “many people outside of bitcoin” do “care about privacy and have built good privacy tools” – and instructed that BTC fans sit up and take word.

He wrote:

“One failure of [bitcoin] maximalism is that by attacking anyone or any project that’s not bitcoin, they’re attacking privacy developers and tools.”

“Privacy,” Lifthrasir concluded, “requires allies.”

Another bitcoiner, Muneeb Ali, the co-founder of the open-source BTC sensible contract platform Stacks, concurred. Ali opined that it was time to “put our crypto tribalism aside” as “the Crypto Wars II are starting.” He claimed that the Specially Designated Nationals record was a “sanctions list” that was “meant for people, not tech tools.”

Ali wrote:

“Privacy tools are for every American.”

Indeed, the ETH advocate and software program engineer Adriano Feria had a stark warning for bitcoiners, writing:

“Let me remind you [that] they are conspiring against BTC as well, and they will [attack] mining with [Environmental, Social, and Governance] narratives, and it will not end there.”

Feria was responding to feedback elsewhere on Twitter that instructed that Ethereum’s transfer to a proof-of-stake (PoS) protocol might safeguard it from those that try and assault crypto mining on environmental grounds.

Speaking to CNBC, Tom Robinson, the Chief Scientist on the blockchain analytics supplier Elliptic was quoted as stating:

“There is a need for solutions that can help you cover your tracks, even when you’re not doing anything illicit.”

The Founder of the ShapeShift crypto alternate Erik Voorhees turned up the irony, writing sardonically:

“I’m sure the bad guys will stop using Tornado Cash because it’s ‘illegal’ Just like they don’t use illegal weapons, smuggle illegal drugs, or illegally launder money through every means they can find. Law-abiding Americans are the only ones hurt by this.”

There have been even affords of help from some.

The Tornado developer Roman Semenov wrote on Twitter that his GitHub account had been “suspended,” lamenting:

“Is writing an open source code illegal now?”

But the operator of the safe cellular bitcoin pockets supplier Samourai Wallet Twitter account responded by providing to let Semenov use the pockets’s “self-hosted GitLab to host your code if you want.”

Meanwhile, at 9:46 UTC, twister money (TORN) was buying and selling at USD 22, down 28% in a day and 13% in per week. Overall, it fell 8% in a month, 63% in a 12 months, and 95% from its February 2021 all-time excessive.

…divided we fall

Not everybody will likely be unhappy to see the again of Tornado, it appears.

Mark Jeffrey, the writer of the Max Quick collection of books, claimed that Tornado had had a “house dropped on it,” and that whereas he’s “generally libertarian and pro-privacy,” the mixer “is primarily used for bad things.”

He wrote:

“Post exploit, it’s usually Tornado and gone. So, I’m a bit conflicted, but I have to support this.”

Ryan Selkis, the Founder of Messari, agreed, writing that he “would like to not live in a dystopian hellscape where privacy is illegal by default,” however defined:

“Also, I would like to not live in a world where North Korea can effectively seize 10% of M1 through bridge hacks.”

____
Peter Van Valkenburgh, of Coin Center, on the OFAC Tornado money SDN itemizing

The occasions they’re a-changin’

No matter which facet of the fence you sit on in relation to crypto mixers, most agree that the OFAC’s transfer will seemingly transform a watershed second in regulation.

Jake Chervinsky, the Head of Policy on the Blockchain Association, wrote:

“For years, the Treasury has carefully distinguished bad actors from the neutral tools and technology that they (plus everyone else in the world) are able to use. The decision to sanction TornadoCash, a decentralized protocol, threatens that smart and balanced approach to crypto.”

And the ban’s results are already being felt. Circle, the mastermind of the USD coin (USDC) stablecoin, has frozen some USD 75,000 price of its tokens that have been related to Tornado, per Dune knowledge.

____

Compiled by Coinbold

5/5 - (100 votes)